<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Google Didn&#8217;t Shed Tears for Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techworking.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/why-google-didnt-shed-tears-for-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techworking.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/why-google-didnt-shed-tears-for-facebook/</link>
	<description>Tech work. Networking...Techworking. In the Hudson Valley and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 05:16:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nitin</title>
		<link>http://techworking.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/why-google-didnt-shed-tears-for-facebook/#comment-2429</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 05:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techworking.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/why-google-didnt-shed-tears-for-facebook/#comment-2429</guid>
		<description>Google have always been a quality service provider. They have been providing various services for people like the Google Search, Social Networking (orkut), Google Apps and many more services which are a real &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hichicfashion.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jewel&lt;/a&gt; for people. I wish them best of luck and lets only GOOGLE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google have always been a quality service provider. They have been providing various services for people like the Google Search, Social Networking (orkut), Google Apps and many more services which are a real <a href="http://www.hichicfashion.com" rel="nofollow">jewel</a> for people. I wish them best of luck and lets only GOOGLE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So we wanted a middleware for social networks? Google OpenSocial is just that.</title>
		<link>http://techworking.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/why-google-didnt-shed-tears-for-facebook/#comment-1807</link>
		<dc:creator>So we wanted a middleware for social networks? Google OpenSocial is just that.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techworking.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/why-google-didnt-shed-tears-for-facebook/#comment-1807</guid>
		<description>[...] some speculation as to whether Google didn&#8217;t invite Facebook to participate in the OpenSocial Platform (as Facebook claims) or whether Facebook simply did not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some speculation as to whether Google didn&#8217;t invite Facebook to participate in the OpenSocial Platform (as Facebook claims) or whether Facebook simply did not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
