Why Google Didn’t Shed Tears for Facebook

Techcrunch has further word on Google’s OpenSocial effort to allow for portable social data across multiple participating networks (Facebook, surprise, surprise, is not among the initial partners). I left this comment on the post re: Google’s latest undertaking:

Continuation of the grand theme: Google doesn’t do content, they make it easier for you to find it, create it, share it. They don’t do social networks, just make the ones you already use better/easier. Don’t (won’t) make a phone, but will hopefully make mobile web apps (and OS) better and also makes carriers nervous. Cool, cool, and cool. Of course, I’m still nervous about all the data they have on me, you, and him.


2 Responses to “Why Google Didn’t Shed Tears for Facebook”

  1. 1 Nitin September 7, 2009 at 5:16 am

    Google have always been a quality service provider. They have been providing various services for people like the Google Search, Social Networking (orkut), Google Apps and many more services which are a real jewel for people. I wish them best of luck and lets only GOOGLE

  1. 1 So we wanted a middleware for social networks? Google OpenSocial is just that. Trackback on November 2, 2007 at 5:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

RSS Google Reader Shared Items

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

Techworking's del.icio.us links

October 2007
« Sep   Dec »

%d bloggers like this: